3 ms·
So what does this actually translate to in terms of Mojo? Rust has algebraic types and pattern matching, C++ has some specific use cases that are "tacked-on", t
by saghm 2mo ago
So what does this actually translate to in terms of Mojo? Rust has algebraic types and pattern matching, C++ has some specific use cases that are "tacked-on", to use your phrasing, so when the parent comment says that Mojo is what a good C++ would look like, they're saying...it doesn't have algebraic types, or that they're tacked on? It's not clear to me why that would be a selling point, so giving the parent commenter the benefit of the doubt, I don't think this sounds like what they were trying to say.
- snovymgodym 2mo agoI don't know about Mojo. I was just answering "...I can't think of obvious ways in which Rust's semantics (as opposed to syntax) are more functional than C++'s"