3 ms·
"MySQL was also potentially faster as it did not implement all features of the SQL standard. " This is a not great start. I assume it refers to MyISAM which ha
by rwultsch 1mo ago
"MySQL was also potentially faster as it did not implement all features of the SQL standard. "
This is a not great start. I assume it refers to MyISAM which has not been relevant for over a decade at this point. InnoDB made different design than PG decisions and was (and perhaps still is) faster at point lookups.
- radiospiel 1mo agoWell, the poster explicitly talks about 2003 here: „ In 2003, MySQL was much more widely used than PostgreSQL. MySQL was also potentially faster as it did not implement all features of the SQL standard“
- browningstreet 1mo agoAt the time, MySQL was also the default for every PHP backed webhost provider. That's the market they lost. They're the Perl of DBs.
- actionfromafar 1mo agoDidn't very early mysql play fast and loose with the concept of actually syncing to disk? That was also fast. Web scale fast. :)
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]