3 ms·
Except, of course, for economics, where the only way to spur growth is to increase the spoils for the victors and any suggestion that barrier reduction could be
by smallmancontrov 2mo ago
Except, of course, for economics, where the only way to spur growth is to increase the spoils for the victors and any suggestion that barrier reduction could be a good investment makes you dumb and wrong and anti-growth. Why are you anti growth? Don't you want to grow the economy?
(/s -- which is important to say, because this line of thinking isn't just common, it's consensus)
- sanderjd 2mo agoThis seems like a very hyperbolic simplification of what economics minded people think and say.
- smallmancontrov 2mo agoThe Chicago School likes to imagine and behave as if it has a monopoly on economic thought. It does not, and I certainly agree that it would be inappropriate to cast all economists in the same light, but it is not inappropriate to needle Chicago School propaganda from both of these angles.