3 ms·
> The bun rewrite is looked to as proof that this sort of full-throttle vibecoding is the future of software development To who? You? > To prove that, a prope
by re-thc 2mo ago
> The bun rewrite is looked to as proof that this sort of full-throttle vibecoding is the future of software development
To who? You?
> To prove that, a proper release is needed
For who? Who is trying to prove what?
> It's Jarred that keeps saying it'll be released tomorrow
There's no official blog... he's just rambling on x?
> Github insights for the last week
That's the problem with the rest of your post. Bun is no longer VC-fueled open source project. It got sold to Anthropic.
> There's a huge partisan eagerness to declare the Claude Code release
Hence there isn't. The Claude Code release is for its own use.
- aureate 2mo agoNone of that makes any sense whatsoever.
- orf 2mo agoPretty simple: it shipped to the owner.
- dgellow 2mo agoAka: internal beta
- orf 2mo agoClaude code is for sure the most widely used bun application. So the majority of bun users are using it. That’s not what I’d call an internal beta?
- dgellow 2mo agoSure but that’s how you beta test a runtime, by using it in a codebase you control. Claude is publicly released and used widely, that’s still only a single codebase