3 ms·
The AI Slopologists strike again. More garbage by garbage people.
by slopsosn 2mo ago
The AI Slopologists strike again. More garbage by garbage people.
- subarctic 2mo agoCan't tell if you mean the people the article is talking about or the article itself
- what 2mo ago¿Por qué no los dos?
- prolly97 2mo agoIs this just an opinion? If so, fair. If it's an attempt at rebutting their claims etc, it'd be easier to interact if you provided some data, or concrete observations :)
- inigyou 2mo agoThe bullshit asymmetry principle suggests that once something is identified as bullshit, we shouldn't spend much time to write an excruciatingly detailed refutation.
- prolly97 2mo agoInvoking the bullshit card on opposing views, in order not to have to elaborate your own pov, seems counterproductive, if the aim of your participation in a discussion is to test your own hypotheses about the world - or in any way gain or deliver insights.
- joegibbs 2mo agoI might build a Chrome extension that looks for “AI” in HN submission titles and shows a fake comment at the start saying “AI is all slop garbage that’s total slop and I hate it. AI sucks and it’s slop!” It will save people time reading the 5-10 other identical vacuous comments
- danggggg 2mo ago[dead]
- joegibbs 2mo agoRebuttal to what? I’m complaining that it’s a totally pointless comment that could be used on any AI related post. The comment just says “AI is slop garbage that sucks”. What am I going to say to that? Obviously it can’t suck that badly or there wouldn’t be a large majority of programmers using it, plenty of famous programmers and developers of languages praising it, millions of people paying for $200 plans. It doesn’t need to be Carmack-level to get a massive amount of use out of it when you can just say “implement this chart here, give me some ideas on speeding up this algorithm, write a function that converts this heightmap to a .fbx” and it writes it.