> Don't we typically call that ad hominem? I think we'd typically call that bias. > And secondly, is your claim that every single one of these hundreds of lar

> Don't we typically call that ad hominem? I think we'd typically call that bias. > And secondly, is your claim that every single one of these hundreds of large orgs are historically politically or religiously anti Israel? Plenty of those organizations/countries do have historical problems when it comes to antisemitism which is obviously highly correlated with an anti-Israel bias. Which of these organizations/countries don't have a history of either blatant anti-Israel bias(i.e. clear double standards) and/or outright antisemitism?