3 ms·
You're just making up your own definitions of things. If the complete source is available and distributable under an OSI-approved license, it is absolutely Ope
by SwellJoe 2mo ago
You're just making up your own definitions of things.
If the complete source is available and distributable under an OSI-approved license, it is absolutely Open Source. Accepting outside contributions is nowhere in the definition of Open Source.
- zephen 2mo agoIt seems like the same sort of category error that some people make regarding free speech. Just as you can say whatever you want, but facebook/twitter/reddit/whoever is not required to give you a soapbox, you can download this software and make whatever changes you want, but nobody is required to give a shit about your proposed changes.