3 ms·

In theory, sure, but the reality is that "development activity" revolves around "codebase". Plenty of projects have separate bug tracker, source code control an

by fg137 2mo ago

In theory, sure, but the reality is that "development activity" revolves around "codebase". Plenty of projects have separate bug tracker, source code control and CI system. Most people likely prefer GitHub's all-in-one solution, especially for small-medium open source projects.

shimman 2mo ago
And do we not see how terrible this is as a result? Hitching your tent to corporations, especially American corporations, is always an exercise in misery.
- dalemhurley 2mo ago
  *Atlassian from Australia has joined the chat*
  - rcleveng 2mo ago
    Mostly they joined the chat to show you what real misery is. I tried Jira and they couldn't even handle simple billing without screwing it up. Ugh
    - pavo-etc 2mo ago
      I recently had to rebuild a jira frontend from scratch just so a single jira tab didn't take down my 8gb MacBook. Support only the subset of features I actually use and it's great. Makes me hate jira even more.
      - xvilka 2mo ago
        Thankfully, there is a Jira CLI tool[1]. [1] https://github.com/ankitpokhrel/jira-cli/ https://github.com/ankitpokhrel/jira-cli/
        rcleveng 2mo ago
        and thankfully there is linear. :-)
- jingpostmedia 2mo ago
  [flagged]
- fg137 2mo ago
  I'm not saying it's an objectively "good" solution, just how damn smooth the experience is.
Groxx 2mo ago
They've already separated the wiki's version control, why not CI? And the issues/discussions are just vendor lock-in wrapped in a shiny UI.