It is my comment. The point of my comment is to make two observations: one that there is indeed still a vocal anti-AI crowd here, and another about their usual

It is my comment. The point of my comment is to make two observations: one that there is indeed still a vocal anti-AI crowd here, and another about their usual conduct. It did not in any way assert that they don't have a point, just that they often lean on bad arguments. The confusion is that I was talking on the meta level of what the discourse is like, and you are trying to engage in the object level of that discourse itself. That said: the fact that you can make your anti-AI argument without being incivil supports my first observation, and doesn't in any way detract from the second. For that matter, your allegation of a "massive crime against humanity" doesn't even specify the crime, let alone attempt to evidence it. And while still civil, it is loaded with emotionally charged rhetoric.