> even though the system had existed the whole time. But it didn't. Isn't that the point of someone inventing it? If the system existed the whole time then it

> even though the system had existed the whole time. But it didn't. Isn't that the point of someone inventing it? If the system existed the whole time then it would most likely be much more realized. Also people don't use this system because 99% of people don't right things down in tables. I know not many people hand write things anymore but even typing up ingredient lists on a machine I don't begin by creating a table. Also this article format of numbered tweet responses as images is just terrible. What am I reading Buzzfeed? I had to stop reading. Also isn't "viral" 100k or more? Not 10's of thousands? This is a clickbait article. But it brings up a bigger question: why claim that something is viral with 100,000+ views/likes/shares/responses/whatever when we know damn well Twitter is full of bots?