3 ms·
I basically agree, but I'd also say: Every Gmail user has already accepted such a promise as sufficient.
by akoboldfrying 2mo ago
I basically agree, but I'd also say: Every Gmail user has already accepted such a promise as sufficient.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- phatfish 2mo agoI wouldn't be surprised if Gmail data has far more access restrictions internally at Google than this auction bought dump.
- flaburgan 2mo agoBut the Spirit customers may not have a Gmail or even a Google account? I personally don't.
- akoboldfrying 2mo agoSure, a Spirit customer with no Gmail account can absolutely complain and/or be wary of this. I didn't mean what I wrote as a complete counterargument -- just trying to indicate the "scale" of the privacy issue here, which is that it's something that many people already tacitly accept.
- frollogaston 2mo agoEven those customers probably have something that's neither self-hosted nor privacy-focused. If it's not gmail, it's one of the counterparts.