4 ms·

I have switched to Chagpt sub now after only using Claude for coding. You get more value for your money and feels like codex has reached Claude code performanc

I have switched to Chagpt sub now after only using Claude for coding. You get more value for your money and feels like codex has reached Claude code performance in coding (the reason for using Claude) regular plus account allows you to have access to their most powerful model, image generation and asking questions is better because you can use sol but in instant mode and it feels smarter and faster. And finally codex usage limits are better than the Claude daily 5h limit. And codex feels faster although Claude code had more features

gb2d_hn 2mo ago
I switched as I felt Codex was on a par with Opus, but the chat responses from Sol are just more intelligible than the word soup I've been getting from Opus. I wonder if Opus could be prompted to respond in simpler prose via agents.md
- marcyb5st 2mo ago
  Ah, so I am not the only one struggling with deciphering Opus writing style. At times I feel dumb as a rock because I read the same passage like 5 times and I still don't get it.
- FluffyPancake 2mo ago
  I have also noticed that I am increasingly struggling to read what LLMs are writing, finding it incomprehensible half the time. I stole Matt Pocock's line of "When reporting information to me, be extremely concise and sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision." for the agents.md It makes it a little better. I also specify to use https://github.com/AminBlg/SimpleEnglish/ https://github.com/AminBlg/SimpleEnglish/ for all writing it does including code comments. It all feels like a bandaids but that seems to be the best we can do right now.
- jen729w 2mo ago
  > I wonder if Opus could be prompted to respond in simpler prose via agents.md God knows I've tried. I've got a variant of the ASD-STE100 trick which does the job, mostly, at the start … but get to about 100k of context and it goes out the window. The model's personality is too strong for simple suggestion, alas.
- no_no_no_yes 2mo ago
  Yes it can, it's called "output style" under `/config`: ``` This changes how Claude Code communicates with you 1. Default Claude completes coding tasks efficiently and provides concise responses 2. Proactive Claude executes immediately, minimizes interruptions, and prefers action over planning 3. Explanatory Claude explains its implementation choices and codebase patterns 4. Learning Claude pauses and asks you to write small pieces of code for hands-on practice ``` You can set up a custom one under `vi ~/.claude/output-styles/eli5.md` and `eli5` would show up in the list above: ``` --- name: ELI5 description: keep it simple please keep-coding-instructions: true --- I can't process lengthy text, talk to me like I'm 5. Small words, short sentences, short paragraphs. If you have to use a big word, explain it right after. Only return what's actually necessary. Just tell me what you did, did it work, what do I do now. If I have to decide something: show 3 options max, the context I need to pick fast, and which one you'd go with. Keep paths and commands exact. I have no brain cells left for the rest. ``` I'm not sure if it's a good thing that there's a config option for this, it kinda means they know there's issues with verbosity.
andypants 2mo ago
> codex has reached Claude code performance in coding Codex has always beaten claude in coding benchmarks, hasn't it?

gb2d_hn 2mo ago

I switched as I felt Codex was on a par with Opus, but the chat responses from Sol are just more intelligible than the word soup I've been getting from Opus. I wonder if Opus could be prompted to respond in simpler prose via agents.md

marcyb5st 2mo ago
Ah, so I am not the only one struggling with deciphering Opus writing style. At times I feel dumb as a rock because I read the same passage like 5 times and I still don't get it.
FluffyPancake 2mo ago
I have also noticed that I am increasingly struggling to read what LLMs are writing, finding it incomprehensible half the time. I stole Matt Pocock's line of "When reporting information to me, be extremely concise and sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision." for the agents.md It makes it a little better. I also specify to use https://github.com/AminBlg/SimpleEnglish/ https://github.com/AminBlg/SimpleEnglish/ for all writing it does including code comments. It all feels like a bandaids but that seems to be the best we can do right now.
jen729w 2mo ago
> I wonder if Opus could be prompted to respond in simpler prose via agents.md God knows I've tried. I've got a variant of the ASD-STE100 trick which does the job, mostly, at the start … but get to about 100k of context and it goes out the window. The model's personality is too strong for simple suggestion, alas.
no_no_no_yes 2mo ago
Yes it can, it's called "output style" under `/config`: ``` This changes how Claude Code communicates with you 1. Default Claude completes coding tasks efficiently and provides concise responses 2. Proactive Claude executes immediately, minimizes interruptions, and prefers action over planning 3. Explanatory Claude explains its implementation choices and codebase patterns 4. Learning Claude pauses and asks you to write small pieces of code for hands-on practice ``` You can set up a custom one under `vi ~/.claude/output-styles/eli5.md` and `eli5` would show up in the list above: ``` --- name: ELI5 description: keep it simple please keep-coding-instructions: true --- I can't process lengthy text, talk to me like I'm 5. Small words, short sentences, short paragraphs. If you have to use a big word, explain it right after. Only return what's actually necessary. Just tell me what you did, did it work, what do I do now. If I have to decide something: show 3 options max, the context I need to pick fast, and which one you'd go with. Keep paths and commands exact. I have no brain cells left for the rest. ``` I'm not sure if it's a good thing that there's a config option for this, it kinda means they know there's issues with verbosity.

andypants 2mo ago

> codex has reached Claude code performance in coding Codex has always beaten claude in coding benchmarks, hasn't it?