3 ms·
Your refusal to look up "censor" in a dictionary doesn't make you right. Some people are actually trying to have a reasoned discussion about the downsides of wh
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2mo ago
Your refusal to look up "censor" in a dictionary doesn't make you right. Some people are actually trying to have a reasoned discussion about the downsides of what the administration is doing, in particular the censorship, which is the problem with articles like this being flagged, especially when it's justified with partisan hyperbole such as what can be found in your comments here.
- torstenvl 2mo agoThe government choosing not to engage in or endorse certain speech does not suppress others engaging in that speech. What is your argument here?
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2mo ago> "Censorship of government websites" is an oxymoron. > The government choosing not to engage in or endorse certain speech does not suppress others engaging in that speech. The second sentence is not related to what I'm saying. I'm responding to the notion that government resources can't be censored. > What is your argument here? There is no argument, but an observation: government resources can be censored. I'm not going to insult you by copying a definition of "censor" and explaining how it is possible to apply that action to government documents. You're smart enough to figure that out on your own.
- torstenvl 1mo agoYou are quite simply wrong. It would appear willfully so.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1mo agoThis is a perfect example of a psychological projection. Your comment describes itself.