4 ms·
That's understandable, but surely there's a way to bypass it? You need to have a breakglass procedures lol
by parthdesai 3mo ago
That's understandable, but surely there's a way to bypass it? You need to have a breakglass procedures lol
- penultimatename 3mo ago“lol just use a workaround” doesn’t work in an environment with hundreds or thousands of employees coupled with audit, security, and other legal requirements to ship software.
- parthdesai 3mo agoIf you're actually bleeding money, you better believe you'll get permissions for a workaround, if you know what you're doing. It all ties back to the OP, where the issue you've might not be as bad as you think. I have been in situations where we have dropped all procedures to push a hot fix because we were actively bleeding money, and in situations where you know there is an issue, and you let it be.
- penultimatename 3mo agoWhat an odd hill to die on. Maybe I just lost a $30M client because they wanted an issue fixed now. Maybe my company would get sued for violating their contractual obligations if someone went cowboy to bypass procedures. Maybe I pay for a service and I want that service to work consistently during core business hours.
- bmitc 3mo ago"Just recreate GitHub internally."
- red-iron-pine 3mo ago"just redo the whole CI/CD pipeline bro, it's easy"