5 ms·
> at which point, why not just do that from zig. because for the same effort you get a better result if you can and do use a better tool?
by pas 2mo ago
> at which point, why not just do that from zig.
because for the same effort you get a better result if you can and do use a better tool?
- QwenGlazer9000 2mo agoI didn't say don't use LLMs. In fact, I'm quite certain they could help quite a bit. But I don't think they did it in a way that actually provided a meaningful gain. My point is that the state of the codebase right after the code is just a worse version of the original zig code with few of the rust advantages. Going from that Frankenstein rust code to actual memory safe rust is a similar leap to going from zig.