4 ms·
Not the same company but similar discussions here: - It was believed that GitHub would be more reliable than our self hosted Gitlab CI runners. This has proven
by Macha 2mo ago
Not the same company but similar discussions here:
- It was believed that GitHub would be more reliable than our self hosted Gitlab CI runners. This has proven to be very false.
- It was believed it would be easier to write tooling. I’m not on the dev tooling team, so can’t confirm if they found it true or not, but from the outside I see a lot more “Github can’t do that” than I did “Gitlab can’t do it”
- Normal_gaussian 2mo agoThose are both hilarious to me. In my last FTE role we had the exact opposite beliefs - we wanted to leave GitLabs increases in pricing and move to annual sub, but the reliability of self-hosted runners and the flexibility (and clarity) of the CI system was fantastic.
- dataengineer56 2mo ago> Those are both hilarious to me. Why is it hilarious to believe that the industry leader might be better at something than doing it yourself?
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- Normal_gaussian 2mo agoThe hilarious part is more the absurdity and cognitive disconnect experienced when reading about serious evaluations that went in a completely opposite direction to those directly participated in.