4 ms·
My anecdotal evidence says its still as blind as any other model, it has no taste, no attention to any sort of detail.
by sscaryterry 2mo ago
My anecdotal evidence says its still as blind as any other model, it has no taste, no attention to any sort of detail.
- howdareme 2mo agoHow can a vision model have taste?
- sscaryterry 2mo agoReplace taste with consistent if that helps you. Can it follow a design system...
- velcrovan 2mo agoSo, formulaic output…the opposite of taste
- sscaryterry 2mo agoNot really. Compliance with the letter of the law doesn't mean the intent is complied with.
- yreg 2mo agoAs a design system engineer I usually have to fight against the taste of the designers. (And I consider it natural.) But, if you have a proper well documented design system and you tell the LLM to use the DS and to avoid styling hacks they can generally do it. Even the dumber ones than Sol 5.6. Of course only if the design is achievable in the design system.
- sscaryterry 2mo agoThis is not my experience at all.
- sarreph 2mo agoIf you're doing any kind of inference that is multi-modal and non-factual, opinions and biases will affect any kind of assessment of a visual that you provide to a model. For example, a UI / UX professional being asked to appraise a website screenshot may determine that the image in question has "desirable" traits which are inherently not deterministically measurable. Such as, if the interface elements have strong information hierarchy, or if they are deemed to be "fashionable" with current UI trends.
- DaiPlusPlus 2mo ago> if the interface elements have strong information hierarchy ...but that's an example of a UX/usability matter that can be assessed objectively and non-subjectively.
- sarreph 2mo agoI disagree. Is 16 px or 14 px a better font-size value for a subheading, in a hypothetical layout? Immediately that kind of decision, where both options are objectively good for 12 px paragraph text, suddenly becomes an issue of taste that cannot be evaluated crudely by an algorithm.