> The reason is because of the “universal geometry of embeddings”, i.e all human languages have the same underlying pattern structure, so any model that is very

> The reason is because of the “universal geometry of embeddings”, i.e all human languages have the same underlying pattern structure, so any model that is very good in any language is good in all languages. I think this claim is acceptable in context, but taken alone, this needs to be qualified. Some aspects of language are universal, like abstract information structure and other pragmatics, but no model is going to speak rural Khmer dialects well anytime soon because not enough of it has been digitized, fundamentally speaking, hence qualifying what it means to "be good at all languages".