5 ms·

> being allowed to train on any data that you can legally obtain ought to be a right for anyone. I have the opposit viewpoint to the extreme. They shouldn't be

by bmacho 2mo ago

> being allowed to train on any data that you can legally obtain ought to be a right for anyone. I have the opposit viewpoint to the extreme. They shouldn't be allowed to even read that data until they are very clear about what they will or not do with it. Can they publish it? Can they store it? Can they use the information in it on prediction markets? Etc. Humans reading texts historically come with little negative consequences, but machines reading and processing texts en masse is more dangerous and should be regulated.

UqWBcuFx6NV4r 2mo ago
> Humans reading texts historically come with little negative consequences, but machines reading and processing texts en masse is more dangerous and should be regulated. Citation needed. This is sounding tautological.
- Timshel 2mo ago
  Not really hard to find example: License plate ALPR like Flock ?
  - ragequittah 2mo ago
    And not really hard to find examples of humans reading text being way more consequential than that. See: the Bible, nazi propaganda, etc.
    - afiori 2mo ago
      A legislative solution to Flock seems a lot more feasible than one for literacy
moron4hire 2mo ago
> Humans reading texts historically come with little negative consequences IDK, we do have laws against opening other people's mail. Those have been on the books for hundreds of years. Seems like someone figured out a while ago that certain unauthorized humans reading certain restricted text wouldn't be good.