3 ms·

Thanks for the feedback! That might be my fault, I am not a designer, and I asked for most UI decisions. I tried to use colors to diferentiate models, the sit

by XCSme 2mo ago

Thanks for the feedback! That might be my fault, I am not a designer, and I asked for most UI decisions. I tried to use colors to diferentiate models, the site is very data dense and it's hard to make everything readable. I've spent hundreds of hours building it, not sure if I would call it slop, but I just suck at design, lol Any suggestions on how to improve it?

sgt 2mo ago
How about a complete rewrite that is not vibe coded? I'm only half serious. You're likely to use an LLM to help develop it, but don't let it take you for a ride. LLM's really struggle with data dense and robust designs. Have a look at https://diskprices.com/ https://diskprices.com/ - this is great UX because it's extremely functional, yet it has nearly no design to speak of. On a scale of data dense designs, this one would be on the extreme side, so I guess if you ask the LLM to meet you somewhere in the middle.
- XCSme 2mo ago
  I do try to guide it, I don't think strictly telling LLMs what to do works best. I like letting the LLM do what it thinks it's best (supposedly it is a lot smarter than me), and then guide it in the directions I think it should go and fix the flaws I notice. I checked out that link on mobile, but it's unfortunately unusable. I will check it out later on desktop, thank you.
- XCSme 2mo ago
  I am still pretty happy with some UX decisions I took: - the spotlight search, you can do ctrl+k and search "gpt vs claude vs google" and it automatically shows the most relevant comparison - drag to reorder compared models - filter leaderboard by multiple comma separated needles, so you can see for example all qwen and kimi models only - the showcases page is quite cool A lot of invisible UI/UX features are there, which I think work great, only the visual presentation could be, as you mentioned, a lot better.
  - sgt 2mo ago
    Fair enough. I'll check it out in the next few weeks to see how the site evolves.

by XCSme 2mo ago

sgt 2mo ago

How about a complete rewrite that is not vibe coded? I'm only half serious. You're likely to use an LLM to help develop it, but don't let it take you for a ride. LLM's really struggle with data dense and robust designs. Have a look at https://diskprices.com/ https://diskprices.com/ - this is great UX because it's extremely functional, yet it has nearly no design to speak of. On a scale of data dense designs, this one would be on the extreme side, so I guess if you ask the LLM to meet you somewhere in the middle.

XCSme 2mo ago
I do try to guide it, I don't think strictly telling LLMs what to do works best. I like letting the LLM do what it thinks it's best (supposedly it is a lot smarter than me), and then guide it in the directions I think it should go and fix the flaws I notice. I checked out that link on mobile, but it's unfortunately unusable. I will check it out later on desktop, thank you.
XCSme 2mo ago
I am still pretty happy with some UX decisions I took: - the spotlight search, you can do ctrl+k and search "gpt vs claude vs google" and it automatically shows the most relevant comparison - drag to reorder compared models - filter leaderboard by multiple comma separated needles, so you can see for example all qwen and kimi models only - the showcases page is quite cool A lot of invisible UI/UX features are there, which I think work great, only the visual presentation could be, as you mentioned, a lot better.
- sgt 2mo ago
  Fair enough. I'll check it out in the next few weeks to see how the site evolves.