3 ms·

Would be great if either one would be able to back their claims with some data. But yes, I'd also imagine that SaaS version gets more traffic, but maybe there a

by tommica 2mo ago

Would be great if either one would be able to back their claims with some data. But yes, I'd also imagine that SaaS version gets more traffic, but maybe there are some self-hosted enterprise editions that get insane amount of traffic

manquer 2mo ago
Here you go > Sentry processes 594 trillion events a year across 200,000 organizations.[1] That translates to an average of 18.8M events/sec , peak is likely 3-5x of that rather than evenly distributed 365dx24h. Even in 2019/2020 they were doing 500B events a year[2]. There are few single applications anywhere close to that scale, (it is nature of the error monitoring stack), certainly not outside Hyperscalers -Google's Zanzibar [3] comes to mind as definitely larger and equally complicated to be precise as its surface involves security. The parent poster misunderstood my statement, I only said Lago is likely more self-hosted than cloud(like Sentry), not that some single's tenant self-hosted instance is larger than Sentry cloud (!). In terms of reliability they need pretty high nines - nobody would accept their error logging infra to go down, not that different from as payment gateway. While payments is more complex for precision and all the banking integrations you need to manage and reconciliation, error monitoring tooling is orders of magnitude more scale buy its nature. [1] https://blog.sentry.io/self-healing-software https://blog.sentry.io/self-healing-software [2] https://sentry.io/about/press-releases/sentry-application-monitoring-achieves-200-increase-in-enterprise-growth/?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://sentry.io/about/press-releases/sentry-application-mo... [3] https://research.google/pubs/zanzibar-googles-consistent-global-authorization-system/ https://research.google/pubs/zanzibar-googles-consistent-glo...
- tommica 2mo ago
  That is a big number... Thanks for sharing the data!

by tommica 2mo ago

manquer 2mo ago

Here you go > Sentry processes 594 trillion events a year across 200,000 organizations.[1] That translates to an average of 18.8M events/sec , peak is likely 3-5x of that rather than evenly distributed 365dx24h. Even in 2019/2020 they were doing 500B events a year[2]. There are few single applications anywhere close to that scale, (it is nature of the error monitoring stack), certainly not outside Hyperscalers -Google's Zanzibar [3] comes to mind as definitely larger and equally complicated to be precise as its surface involves security. The parent poster misunderstood my statement, I only said Lago is likely more self-hosted than cloud(like Sentry), not that some single's tenant self-hosted instance is larger than Sentry cloud (!). In terms of reliability they need pretty high nines - nobody would accept their error logging infra to go down, not that different from as payment gateway. While payments is more complex for precision and all the banking integrations you need to manage and reconciliation, error monitoring tooling is orders of magnitude more scale buy its nature. [1] https://blog.sentry.io/self-healing-software https://blog.sentry.io/self-healing-software [2] https://sentry.io/about/press-releases/sentry-application-monitoring-achieves-200-increase-in-enterprise-growth/?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://sentry.io/about/press-releases/sentry-application-mo... [3] https://research.google/pubs/zanzibar-googles-consistent-global-authorization-system/ https://research.google/pubs/zanzibar-googles-consistent-glo...

tommica 2mo ago
That is a big number... Thanks for sharing the data!