2 ms·
I last touched formal verification methods 20 years ago. Back then, Coq had the capacity to automatically transform your proof into OCaml. I would have expected
by david-gpu 2mo ago
I last touched formal verification methods 20 years ago. Back then, Coq had the capacity to automatically transform your proof into OCaml. I would have expected that this would have only gotten better with time.
- djsjajah 2mo agoIt’s been renamed recently. Maybe a few times. I think it’s rocq now. [1] [1] https://rocq-prover.org/docs https://rocq-prover.org/docs
- Nail2680 2mo agoHuh, I missed all of that. The linked discussion about the renaming from your link was a bit odd: https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/coq-community-survey-2022-results-part-iv-and-itp-paper-announcement/2001#renaming-coq-8 https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/coq-community-survey-202... It seemed to me from the survey that most people didn't want it changed or didn't care, but due to anglophone users they decided to change it anyway.