4 ms·
It's obviously not in their interest. Disclosing would only work as marketing for their IPO and it's the most anticipated IPO in history and needs no marketing.
by arjie 2mo ago
It's obviously not in their interest. Disclosing would only work as marketing for their IPO and it's the most anticipated IPO in history and needs no marketing. There is like zero positive side to disclosing audited financial statements and massive liability.
- eddq 2mo ago"There is like zero positive side to disclosing audited financial statements and massive liability." Why are you posting about stuff you have zero clue about? Oh theres no positive side... yes there is. There is a huge amount of failure risk weighing on both OAI and Anthropic - investors don't care about how great you claim your technology is gonna be. They want to know if a viable buisiness model is taking form and whether you will be around long enough given the investment time horizon of the investor. Right now China is making that failure risk even larger. This directly affects the IPO.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- dominotw 2mo agosounds like you dont know what you are talking about. Investors in anthropic dont need public only info. They get disclosures already.