4 ms·

Scientists Identify 3-Minute Exercise Better than 90M one

11 points by guytv 1mo ago

bob1029 1mo ago
If you are worried about injury risk with sprinting, you could consider rowing. > Physiologists, in fact, have calculated that rowing a two-thousand meter race — the Olympic standard — takes the same physiological toll as playing two basketball games back-to-back. And it exacts that toll in about six minutes. https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/an-oarsman-is-a-verb-meaning-to-row/ https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/...
- magicalhippo 1mo ago
  I've always found rowing machines difficult. I guess I got what many have when starting with bikes, where I'd rather go slower at higher resistance, and hence I don't really spool up the resistance fan.
  - bob1029 1mo ago
    If you use an air rower like the C2, you can adjust the damper to control the simulated drag profile. Fully open is like rowing through sand. The most constricted setting you can keep spooled up with very little effort. The important part is that the setting doesn't really matter in terms of how difficult the workout will be. You are always in charge of this. The performance monitor software in these machines only measure the power into the flywheel. If you find that less drag feels better and more engaging, then just use that setting.
    - deleted 1mo ago
      [deleted]
    - magicalhippo 1mo ago
      > The most constricted setting you can keep spooled up with very little effort. Guess I've used different ones. The ones I've used seems to not spool up when going slowly, you need a certain pulling speed to get it to spool up regardless.
nick_pro7 1mo ago
[dead]
beardyw 1mo ago
The full title "Scientists Identify 3-Minute Exercise That May Outperform 90-Minute Workout" has the "perhaps, maybe, who knows" found in the full article. Flim flam and flummery.
ButlerianJihad 1mo ago
What's "90M"? A 90-million exercise? 90 megabytes? Capitalization and abbreviations matter. There was nothing wrong with original headline or the article. OP had to tamper and obfuscate it.
GuestFAUniverse 1mo ago
The original paper at Elsevier writes about 6 * 30s cycling sprints with 4min interruptions. All the sites in between only give a vague abstraction of that.
cjbenedikt 1mo ago
"...three minutes of sprinting produced a dramatic molecular response in the bloodstream, far exceeding the changes seen after 90 minutes of moderate exercise." Key word MODERATE. What about comparing it to HIIT for example?

11 points by guytv 1mo ago

If you are worried about injury risk with sprinting, you could consider rowing. > Physiologists, in fact, have calculated that rowing a two-thousand meter race — the Olympic standard — takes the same physiological toll as playing two basketball games back-to-back. And it exacts that toll in about six minutes. https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/an-oarsman-is-a-verb-meaning-to-row/ https://archive.nytimes.com/6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/...

magicalhippo 1mo ago
I've always found rowing machines difficult. I guess I got what many have when starting with bikes, where I'd rather go slower at higher resistance, and hence I don't really spool up the resistance fan.
- bob1029 1mo ago
  If you use an air rower like the C2, you can adjust the damper to control the simulated drag profile. Fully open is like rowing through sand. The most constricted setting you can keep spooled up with very little effort. The important part is that the setting doesn't really matter in terms of how difficult the workout will be. You are always in charge of this. The performance monitor software in these machines only measure the power into the flywheel. If you find that less drag feels better and more engaging, then just use that setting.
  - deleted 1mo ago
    [deleted]
  - magicalhippo 1mo ago
    > The most constricted setting you can keep spooled up with very little effort. Guess I've used different ones. The ones I've used seems to not spool up when going slowly, you need a certain pulling speed to get it to spool up regardless.

nick_pro7 1mo ago

[dead]

beardyw 1mo ago

The full title "Scientists Identify 3-Minute Exercise That May Outperform 90-Minute Workout" has the "perhaps, maybe, who knows" found in the full article. Flim flam and flummery.

ButlerianJihad 1mo ago

What's "90M"? A 90-million exercise? 90 megabytes? Capitalization and abbreviations matter. There was nothing wrong with original headline or the article. OP had to tamper and obfuscate it.

GuestFAUniverse 1mo ago

The original paper at Elsevier writes about 6 * 30s cycling sprints with 4min interruptions. All the sites in between only give a vague abstraction of that.

cjbenedikt 1mo ago

"...three minutes of sprinting produced a dramatic molecular response in the bloodstream, far exceeding the changes seen after 90 minutes of moderate exercise." Key word MODERATE. What about comparing it to HIIT for example?