4 ms·
You're appealing to ambiguity. All you've said is you have failed—how is anyone supposed to know what went wrong?
by mw888 2mo ago
You're appealing to ambiguity. All you've said is you have failed—how is anyone supposed to know what went wrong?
- hirvi74 2mo agoI suppose they aren't, but I am perfectly fine with reading what has worked for others should they feel inclined to share.
- mw888 2mo agoGenerally constraining scope and providing enough existing material until the LLM is productive. The common counter-argument is that specifying to the sufficient level is more work than just not using an LLM at all. I find that is not a universal rule.