4 ms·
This shouldn't surprise anyone. Austerity (as implemented here) looks only to current account balances and does not consider the long-term impact on revenue. Di
by joelhaus 14y ago
This shouldn't surprise anyone. Austerity (as implemented here) looks only to current account balances and does not consider the long-term impact on revenue. Ditch digging theories aside, when government can borrow at rate x and can reasonably expect to get a return > x on an investment, it should generally do so.
Debt levels must be taken in context. Alone, it is a meaningless number used to scare an ignorant public by people with an agenda of shrinking government. Rather, the focus should shift to promoting more effective government.
- justincormack 14y agoInvestment? It is all current spending basically. Not sure how to measure the return on that.
- eli_gottlieb 14y agoTransfer payments can actually have fiscal multipliers greater than 1.0. Food Stamps, for example, are actually a net stimulus.
- justincormack 14y agoNot saying they are not a stimulus, but you cant measure their return on investment per se.