3 ms·
You are absolutely correct. To imply that would be incredibly naive. Especially if the assumption that I have not reached those extremes were correct. I would
by slajax 14y ago
You are absolutely correct. To imply that would be incredibly naive. Especially if the assumption that I have not reached those extremes were correct.
I would in no way assume that my approach is a blanket solution for anyone or everyone. To the contrary, it is not a solution (I said I have not beaten it, and I may never well), but this post is my personal experience for dealing with an "illness" that has been very challenging in my life. I can only account for the factors of my experiences which luckily were functional enough for this approach to do some good.
Those factors did indeed include a lot of debilitating and suicide episodes during my teen years but I chose not to write about suicide because it's a much deeper subject and somewhat detracts from the point I hoped to make. But in the interested of full disclosure, yes I had struggled with suicide daily until I changed my thinking.
The reason I said "it's only a negative thing if you allow it to be" is that when I stopped thinking of it as "suffering" I found the core catalyst for change that allowed me to dismiss suicide as an option and maintain that rationale until I could apply other measures and stabilize my situation longer term.
At it's core the illness affects your rationale by way of your moods and I feel it's important to address the fact that someone who is "suffering" implicitly has a negative perspective and will continue to suffer without positivity.
Thanks for your comment.
- vannevar 14y agoAnd thanks for the response. I think this more nuanced explanation of what you meant adds a lot to the message that is missing from the article.