3 ms·
If that's the understanding you came away with, it was clarified in my immediately following comment. Glad we agree that there are labs that will solve very ha
by estearum 2mo ago
If that's the understanding you came away with, it was clarified in my immediately following comment.
Glad we agree that there are labs that will solve very hard parts of creating a novel virus, either by accident or by negligence.
- smallmancontrov 2mo agoIt was dishonest then for you to imply that readily accessible commercial labs didn't take reasonable precautions and it's dishonest now, too.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- estearum 2mo agoDefine "reasonable precautions"? Here's a red team exercise where researchers successfully bought fragments of the best known pathogen in the world, never mind a novel one. What reasonable precautions failed to catch this but we could expect to catch a novel virus that "kinda looks like" a known virus? https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/08/shouldnt-be-easy-buy-synthetic-dna-fragments-recreate-deadly-1918-flu-virus/ https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/08/shouldnt-be-easy-buy-syn...
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- smallmancontrov 2mo agoSo shredding, mutating, and reassembling the genome is the minimum bar to slip it past the scanning? I thought you said you could just order it?
- estearum 2mo agoThis may have flown past you, but we’re commenting on an article about trivially creating novel pathogens The shredding, mutating, reassembling is all it took to get the most well known pathogen in the world by the controls that you are suggesting are sufficiently tight