3 ms·
> The UK has no legal freedom of speech protection. This is completely untrue, as you can confirm by googling. The UK has historically had a problem with over
by foldr 2mo ago
> The UK has no legal freedom of speech protection.
This is completely untrue, as you can confirm by googling.
The UK has historically had a problem with overly restrictive libel laws and libel tourism, but that point can be made without making statements that are obviously false.
- dahdum 2mo agoFrom an American viewpoint, no one else has “free speech”, UK included. The First Amendment is globally unique. So it’s a matter of definitions. > The First Amendment to the US Constitution provides almost absolute protection to freedom of expression. By contrast, European and EU law curtails the right to freedom of expression. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/772890/EPRS_BRI(2025)772890_EN.pdf https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/7728...
- owebmaster 2mo ago> From an American viewpoint, no one else has “free speech”, UK included. That's funny as we see what happens regularly to people trying to exercise their free speech right against a small country in the middle east.
- foldr 2mo agoYes, the First Amendment is unusually permissive. But the sentence "the UK has no legal freedom of speech protection" isn't sensible way to make that point. We're commenting on events which have received extensive (and probably disproportionate) coverage in the UK press, despite the best efforts of Arday and Cambridge. Clearly, their scheme to exploit UK law to silence the press didn't work out. Also, on a minor note, this is an article about something that happened in the UK. An American viewpoint is as valid as any other, but it's not the most relevant here.