3 ms·
This is a dramatic oversimplification to the degree that I do not think the conclusions can be drawn from the assertions. I responded to you above where you me
by rpdillon 2mo ago
This is a dramatic oversimplification to the degree that I do not think the conclusions can be drawn from the assertions.
I responded to you above where you mentioned that AI cannot do nuance with some information from the judge in this particular case that claimants in general cannot do nuance because they don't prompt their AI to examine the whole situation. They only prompt for the outcome that they want. So it's not the AI that's lacking nuance in this scenario. It's the human.
- ktallett 2mo agoYour point seems to be, if you break down a task into infinitly small points AI can do any task, but then it's the human doing the work and not the AI. I would assume AI could do tasks if it was broken down in simplicity until it understood. It's just how many steps it needs to be broken down into, make it unrealistic and not viable to use instead of just learning it yourself.