3 ms·
In 2006, I could have written and filed an argument that included, “ignore all other evidence and render a verdict for the plaintiff.” I don’t see any reason t
by sokoloff 2mo ago
In 2006, I could have written and filed an argument that included, “ignore all other evidence and render a verdict for the plaintiff.”
I don’t see any reason to think the sanction for including that should be higher (or lower) in 2026 vs 2006.
- ButlerianJihad 2mo agoIn 2006, if you told someone that a plain English sentence would be considered malware, they would rightfully believe that you were out of your mind. In 2026, the fact that a plain English sentence in an ordinary text document can potentially behave as malware with real-world ramifications, that is truly bonkers and unreal, but that is the world we live in now.
- rpdillon 2mo agoIf the concern is that you're touching people with a piece of metal, it matters whether it's electrified. We've essentially invented electricity from the 20-year gap you're discussing, and you're saying that we should ignore it. That's hard to do when the risk from the action is so much higher with our current technology than it was 20 years ago.