3 ms·
I wonder how the court became aware of this attempt? It might be as simple as a clerk doing "select all" and noticing the extra selection? Or what else?
by pcrh 2mo ago
I wonder how the court became aware of this attempt?
It might be as simple as a clerk doing "select all" and noticing the extra selection?
Or what else?
- Simulacra 2mo agoMaybe their AI caught it...?
- okwhateverdude 2mo agoLikely has to do with how the ancient PACER system works with the formatting being stripped and thus the content revealed and mega obvious.
- nottorp 2mo agoIt's right there in the article. A clerk wondered why there was so much white space. They don't use LLMs at that court.
- ShinyLeftPad 2mo agoThey don't? > these attacks do not seem to be succeeding, even when a judge isn’t reviewing documents with his own eyes. Brazil’s AI system caught the hidden text before it was processed, Spader noted. And in Elliott’s case, prompts were “exposed, in each of those settings, the moment a human being actually looked at what the machine produced,” Spader said.
- rpdillon 2mo agoNo, they don't. That was the author of the article using something the judge said in reference to AI court systems elsewhere and applying it to a case where it did not apply because no AI was in use. There's a long post near the top of this comment section calling the article "garbage" because of this mistake.
- ezoe 2mo agoThat's their claim without any proof.