4 ms·
I think your algorithm puts too much weight on StumbleUpon "recommendations" which are really StumbleUpon "views". I was happy but surprised to find my startup
by aymeric 14y ago
I think your algorithm puts too much weight on StumbleUpon "recommendations" which are really StumbleUpon "views".
I was happy but surprised to find my startup http://taskarmy.com http://taskarmy.com in the list, and having a closer look at the metrics taken in account, it seems that it is because of the StumbleUpon stats.
- collypops 14y agoSorry if I mislead you. This is not my project. I just thought it was HN-worthy.
- bufferout 14y agoFair point- I've tried not to make any arbitrary decisions on how the data is used but I'll take a look at what the results look like sans stumbleupon.
- bufferout 14y agoTop 20 when I remove the StumbleUpon metric: [lifx.co] => 97.942429714246 [kickfolio.com] => 89.598662998513 [shebusiness.com] => 84.413930181291 [netcomber.com] => 83.758506325309 [readershop.com.au] => 71.445369888231 [nameterrific.com] => 71.375673413085 [bugcrowd.com] => 71.328010040444 [shop2.com] => 71.228983543186 [serviceseeking.com.au] => 68.308687033257 [righttoknow.org.au] => 67.654116949018 [theiconic.com.au] => 67.28062258823 [kogan.com] => 67.173702738231 [retailmenot.com] => 65.963267045507 [startlocal.com.au] => 65.922497275844 [social-medicine.org] => 65.833298346458 [kaggle.com] => 65.616138632997 [manageflitter.com] => 65.551656760889 [freelancer.com] => 65.455719109403 [harris.com] => 65.150296026706 [freelanceswitch.com] => 64.742373047548 Doesn't feel like a substantial shift (good).