sigh Is there really such a need to be so antagonistic in your response? I mean, I get it, lots of people give Go a hard time, and it must be wearying to see t

sigh Is there really such a need to be so antagonistic in your response? I mean, I get it, lots of people give Go a hard time, and it must be wearying to see the same arguments dished out again and again (no GC complaint this time, nice right?). ...but surely, when someone makes a post like this that address actual issues they see with the consistency of the language, which aren't the same as the usual run of the mill complaints about GC, generics, etc. a more mature response would be: Hm, that's interesting. I guess I can see why some people might think that's a language inconsistency or issue, but maybe you'll appreciate the Really Smart Reasons we've chosen to do that when you're more familiar with Go. Instead of: STFU. You don't know what you're talking about. Is it really that difficult to just be a little bit more humble, and consider that other people may have a valid point or two to make?