3 ms·
I'm not saying we won't have breakthroughs or significant capability changes. I'm saying that any reasonable expected rate of breakthroughs is not enough to mai
by gwerbin 2mo ago
I'm not saying we won't have breakthroughs or significant capability changes. I'm saying that any reasonable expected rate of breakthroughs is not enough to maintain exponential R&D effort and to have it translate into exponential progress towards AGI, unless it's an absolutely monumental discovery on par with the GPT LLM itself. It would be impossible to predict, and it would be totally fallacious to credit this author with being a visionary if such a discovery does in fact arise.
- red75prime 2mo ago> I'm saying that any reasonable expected rate of breakthroughs is not enough to maintain exponential R&D effort "Any reasonable expected rate" does a lot of work here. For example, I haven't expected LLM contributions to open math problem that early.