4 ms·
“By our calculations, Jane Street ponied up a one-off $200mn to do the deal and then locked in a further $200mn of costs per annum, at least in part, to avoid u
by JumpCrisscross 3mo ago
“By our calculations, Jane Street ponied up a one-off $200mn to do the deal and then locked in a further $200mn of costs per annum, at least in part, to avoid us gawping at their numbers every quarter. Wowsers” [1].
[1] https://www.ft.com/content/28a51284-98cc-4767-a306-0540d265687f https://www.ft.com/content/28a51284-98cc-4767-a306-0540d2656...
- jt2190 3mo ago> Jane Street has generated more than USD 40 000 000 000 in net trading revenues in the year to Friday, even accounting for the July loss, which exceeds its entire haul for 2025, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.
- JumpCrisscross 3mo agoSure. It’s still an embarrassing hit they’d want to keep secret, particularly if they’re still in those positions. Paying hundreds of millions to hide a $15bn MtM loss makes sense.