4 ms·
It's not really about GPL violation, it's about laziness. There are plenty of things Samsung could have done to work around the GPL without opening a massive ho
by wzdd 14y ago
It's not really about GPL violation, it's about laziness. There are plenty of things Samsung could have done to work around the GPL without opening a massive hole. For example, they could have created a user-space server, which either mapped /dev/mem directly (as root, and then dropped permissions) or mapped this special device but was only given permission to do so after some cryptographic check by the kernel: a simple hash of the text would have sufficed.
This is just a dumb mistake, on par with the original Android G1 release which ran everything you typed on the keyboard in a root shell.