3 ms·
Sure, but you have to take pains to make sure that journalctl -f doesn't skip events or print some twice. It can be made to work, for sure, but it just seems ea
by quotemstr 2mo ago
Sure, but you have to take pains to make sure that journalctl -f doesn't skip events or print some twice. It can be made to work, for sure, but it just seems easier to print logs via a daemon instead, especially because if you go through a deamon, you turn the disk format from an interface into an implementation detail.
- amluto 2mo agoI want my logs readable on a completely read-only disk. Sure, I can start a daemon, but that’s mildly annoying. Also, the syslog daemon should be extremely reliable, and throwing giant table scans at it makes this more complex.