5 ms·
Every fucking website: 2026 edition
- willturman 2mo agoThe GitHub and X logos are chefs kiss
- cigarettestshir 2mo agoThis is one of my favorite things I've ever seen.
- spottedmarley 2mo ago* <- tiny logo
- doublerabbit 2mo agoIf the layout is intentionally LLM generated, heh.
- arodenmaxxing 2mo agooh yeah I worked there
- tripdout 2mo agoThis is almost exactly this website [0] which is also on the frontpage of HN. Wow. 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297469 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297469
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- yourbestcrab 2mo agoI was searching for the logo like an *-hole, but I had to settle for their "men's public restroom" logo instead.
- angoragoats 2mo agoAnd this one, which is on the front page right now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307700 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307700
- angoragoats 2mo agoReplying to my own post to note that the author of the app in my linked post is using an LLM to respond to everyone in the thread. They responded to me (with a clearly LLM written, sycophantic tone) and said that they updated the design. It looks less like the parody site now.
- Bolwin 2mo agoLove the X logo that goes to bluesky
- JK-Swizzle 2mo agoIt is missing the fade in on scroll.
- angoragoats 2mo agoWhy does the HN title say “2026 edition” when the page itself says “Slop edition”? We aren’t supposed to editorialize titles here.[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- andOlga 2mo agoBecause there's been a recent submission titled "Every fucking website (2020)", I guess.
- angoragoats 2mo agoThat is adding a year to the end of the complete title of the article, which is a thing often added to older articles to provide additional context. This is replacing words in the article's title with different words, which, as I said, is counter to the stated rules of the site. If the title was "Every fucking website: Slop edition (2026)," I wouldn't have made my comment.
- noman-land 2mo agoThis needs bluish dark mode with accent color and pills with a little rounded colored border on just the left side.
- devin 2mo agoMissing a flashy nonsense ASCII art animation. Check out https://performative-ui.cncl.co/ https://performative-ui.cncl.co/ if you need an easy one to add.
- TacticalCoder 2mo ago> Trusted by... six companies from the same YC cohort. I giggled.
- BoingBoomTschak 2mo agoThe fact that I can see it with JS disabled really breaks immersion here.
- tosti 2mo agoI expected cloudflare turnstile and if that happens to work, flashing gray bars to "compensate" for an absurdly long loading time.
- walrus01 2mo ago> $ curl -fsSL install.sh | sh # you'd be stupid to run that, slop or not I wish more people would point this out.
- Akronymus 2mo agoI've legitimately seen one project that basically says to do that, but with "your ai agent". At least piping to sh is deterministic and, you can pipe to a filw and check the script https://github.com/0xeb/ghidrasql https://github.com/0xeb/ghidrasql
- walrus01 2mo ago"Claude, install these 215 npm dependencies from unvetted repositores, make no mistakes"
- xigoi 2mo agoI still haven’t seen anyone point out how this is more dangerous than running an executable that you obtain any other way.
- ffsm8 2mo agoyou can detect `curl | bash` server-side and serve a different payload for those (compared to curl -O file, wget etc), hence its an effectively undetectable attack vector. Executables on the other hand can be inspected and prodded, so the likelihood of something going amiss and consequently security agencies finding out about it is significantly higher. neither of those is secure of course, we're just discussing different levels of dangers. And curl|bash being worse, albeit not that much (and the -L here is the extra cherry on top. piping a redirect to a shell is just monkas)
- medstrom 2mo ago> you can detect `curl | bash` server-side Oh wow, ok. So if anything, manually do `curl` and `sh` separately?
- m132 2mo agoIt's not a Claude generated website without at least one `backdrop-filter: blur(1000px)` element that slows older machines to a crawl
- chunkyguy 2mo agoWhat is wrong with this layout?
- addandsubtract 2mo agoThere's nothing wrong with it, per se. It's just that it's overused and filled with random garbage stats that no one cares about.
- possan 2mo agoNeeds a cookie banner, 3s delayed sign up to our newsletter and enable push request
- addandsubtract 2mo agoIt's missing the captcha that fails to load and then makes you retry three times.
- alertchecker 2mo agoIt can't be AI-generated - AI doesn't swear