3 ms·
Quoted from the blog post: > user-data can be protected from data breaches, but then the service provider cannot provide features that depend on the data, suc
by traceroute66 2mo ago
Quoted from the blog post:
> user-data can be protected from data breaches, but then the service provider cannot provide features that depend on the data, such as spam or virus detection
I think they forgot "or advertising" at the end.
I don't trust Google. I would much prefer to use on-prem or - at most - one of the secure-enclave providers like Tinfoil[1] or Private Mode[2]
[1] https://tinfoil.sh/ https://tinfoil.sh/
[2] https://www.privatemode.ai/ https://www.privatemode.ai/
- flambo 2mo agoSecure Enclaves are broken all the time though [1]. They’re also not secure against attacks from a quantum computer (including store now decrypt later attacks). At least with symmetric FHE, anything that happens after encryption requires zero trust. [1] https://sgx.fail/ https://sgx.fail/
- j2kun 2mo agoIndeed, Google itself has a large research group that repeatedly breaks TEEs with side-channels and such.