4 ms·
I wonder if it was (ironically) coined by nonengineers who don't understand how engineers (or other high-stakes professionals at Pareto boundaries) solve proble
by pphysch 2mo ago
I wonder if it was (ironically) coined by nonengineers who don't understand how engineers (or other high-stakes professionals at Pareto boundaries) solve problems: by decomposing problems and identifying optional solutions and weighing the solutions based on various risks, trade-offs and tolerances.
I have seen this personally, where merely identifying a possible solution (harmless, reversible) is misinterpreted as selecting and implementing that solution (may be irreversible).
- fmbb 2mo ago> by decomposing problems and identifying optional solutions and weighing the solutions based on various risks, trade-offs and tolerances. This is how all people solve problems. Now everyone are not great at all parts, but this really is what anyone does. Surely the title ”engineer” means something else?
- pphysch 2mo agoIdeally, but this is not at all taught or incentivized in (American) schools. We're taught to "hack it" which means getting to a solution without much regard for how we got there.
- sporadicism 2mo agoEven if engineers were uniquely capable in this regard it still wouldn't equip them to solve problems in fields where they lack domain expertise.
- pphysch 2mo agoAgain: identifying possible solutions to a problem is not "solving" the problem.
- sporadicism 1mo agoYou're right. I'll rephrase: Even if engineers were uniquely capable in this regard it still wouldn't equip them to identify solutions, let alone solve problems, in fields where they lack domain expertise.
- mrhottakes 2mo agoI have a bachelor's and masters in engineering and was never taught to "hack it" without regard for how a solution is reached. Documenting and analyzing your solution is an extremely important part of managing risk, which is what engineers actually do.
- pphysch 2mo agoNot everyone is going to school for engineering.
- palmotea 2mo agoI believe it was coined by non-engineers to describe the obnoxious behavior of engineers who arrogantly disrespect other's expertise and assume they're better than non-engineers (when the reality is the engineer doesn't know what he's talking about). Often that involves stupid analogies to things like computer systems.