4 ms·
The fact that we are reading this differently is an existence proof that there are multiple ways to interpret the conversation and the points being made within.
by otterley 2mo ago
The fact that we are reading this differently is an existence proof that there are multiple ways to interpret the conversation and the points being made within. We should be mindful of that and respond accordingly, perhaps asking more questions instead of being combative.
- estearum 2mo agoYou are the only person who made an assumption (a probably-incorrect one) and then was combative about it. People on general message boards talking about state surveillance powers are not generally crafting trial strategies. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294009 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294009 > they are not wrong [per my interpretation] > you are therefore a dick I think between 1 lawyer and 2 laypeople talking about law, it's quite likely the lawyer has the idiosyncratic interpretation. I did not fail to ask a question nor did I insult anyone. You did both.
- otterley 2mo ago[dead]