2 ms·
How would more efficient compliance help the constant annoying pop ups?
by theoreticalmal 3mo ago
How would more efficient compliance help the constant annoying pop ups?
- setopt 3mo agoAccording to the rules, accepting or refusing cookies should be equally difficult. Making them both difficult makes people not use your site, so the incentive should be to make both options easy if you follow the rules. Malicious compliance is to make cookie acceptance much easier than refusal. Lack of oversight doesn’t punish this. Now, the incentive is to make life hard for people who decline cookies. That results in more annoying pop-ups.
- ffsm8 3mo agoalso, session cookies for eg login and error tracing etc dont actually need a banner. you only need to use it if youre participating in the internet stalking behaviour by integrating eg google analytics and similar integrations
- kevincox 3mo ago> Malicious compliance is to make cookie acceptance much easier than refusal. That isn't malicious compliance, it is just non-compliance. If the equally difficult rule wasn't there then it would be malicious compliance.
- ForHackernews 3mo agoYou are not required to present an annoying banner to the user. You could simply honor user-agents' DO NOT TRACK header and silently avoid setting tracking cookies and that would comply with the law.