3 ms·

I feel like if they were skills under a reasonable definition, you should be able to name an expert in these skills, and how do we know they are an expert. But

by js8 2mo ago

I feel like if they were skills under a reasonable definition, you should be able to name an expert in these skills, and how do we know they are an expert. But I think you can't. It seems to me, instead, one is better at googling/prompting the better they are in a particular domain, but it only applies in that domain. Like knowing a jargon is not a skill, knowing the domain is.

andsoitis 2mo ago
Soft skills include: handling change under ambiguity, critical thinking under pressure, self-awareness, prioritizing, motivating and guiding others without relying on authority, navigating disagreement constructively.
jfyi 2mo ago
Johnny Long is the godfather of google dorking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo1BR9itwOY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo1BR9itwOY https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-long.pdf https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-long.p... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_Security https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_Security
jfyi 2mo ago
Jason Wei's chain-of-thought prompting techniques literally revolutionized llms themselves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
dspillett 2mo ago
> you should be able to name an expert in these skills There are certainly local “finding information online” experts in many families and social groups. > and how do we know they are an expert They are the ones who get mentioned a lot in conversations in the manner “I'll have to ask [name]” with the implication that [name] will look up the information or know it from previous occasions people (possibly this specific person and [name] is getting sick of them asking and not remembering simple answers!) have asked.
Forgeties79 2mo ago
And of course if you point any of this out people go “Well many people are good at it, people getting bad results are just bad at it.” The constant refrain of “you’re just using it wrong” has become very tiresome. If you can always say “just use it right” every time a critique comes up, then we aren’t having an honest conversation about the limitations of these tools.

by js8 2mo ago

andsoitis 2mo ago

Soft skills include: handling change under ambiguity, critical thinking under pressure, self-awareness, prioritizing, motivating and guiding others without relying on authority, navigating disagreement constructively.

jfyi 2mo ago

Johnny Long is the godfather of google dorking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo1BR9itwOY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo1BR9itwOY https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-long.pdf https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-long.p... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_Security https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_Security

jfyi 2mo ago

Jason Wei's chain-of-thought prompting techniques literally revolutionized llms themselves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

dspillett 2mo ago

> you should be able to name an expert in these skills There are certainly local “finding information online” experts in many families and social groups. > and how do we know they are an expert They are the ones who get mentioned a lot in conversations in the manner “I'll have to ask [name]” with the implication that [name] will look up the information or know it from previous occasions people (possibly this specific person and [name] is getting sick of them asking and not remembering simple answers!) have asked.

Forgeties79 2mo ago

And of course if you point any of this out people go “Well many people are good at it, people getting bad results are just bad at it.” The constant refrain of “you’re just using it wrong” has become very tiresome. If you can always say “just use it right” every time a critique comes up, then we aren’t having an honest conversation about the limitations of these tools.