3 ms·

Any reason why you don't use clang's `-fbounds-safety`? It offers ABI compatibility and incremental adoption. The author of Fil-C worked on it also :-) https:/

Any reason why you don't use clang's `-fbounds-safety`? It offers ABI compatibility and incremental adoption. The author of Fil-C worked on it also :-) https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BoundsSafety.html#overview https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BoundsSafety.html#overview

pizlonator 2mo ago
That is a great feature But it’s strictly less safe than either Fil-C or Rust since it only protects bounds