3 ms·
> The records also showed undercover agents surveilling a virtual meeting at Hunter College in New York [...] ; a meeting at a labor center in Minneapolis > Th
by Terr_ 2mo ago
> The records also showed undercover agents surveilling a virtual meeting at Hunter College in New York [...] ; a meeting at a labor center in Minneapolis
> The documents indicate that agents made audio recordings of the events.
For anyone else wondering (particularly if you're accustomed to it) it looks like neither NY nor MN are two-party consent ones for recording things.
- KennyBlanken 2mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- docdeek 2mo ago> one party consent doesn't necessarily authorize you to secretly record a meeting just because you're present. Isn't that exactly what one party consent laws allow you to do?
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- Terr_ 2mo ago> Hey Junior Woodchuck Law Expert: The charitable interpretation is that you meant to humorously qualify what you were about to say next, so that people judge its accuracy in a kind way. In that case, a trailing "here" (to refer to the speaker) would help ensure people see it that way... as opposed to a weird and unprompted insult. (The rest of your post already has a subthread for it.)