4 ms·
The Indo-European speakers invaded from the north. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migrations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migrations
by oofabz 2mo ago
The Indo-European speakers invaded from the north.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migrations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migrations
- rirze 2mo agoThat doesn't explain Sri Lanka which is past South India... Edit: The actual answer is North/Eastern Indians speaking an IE variant immigrated to Sri Lanka in the 5th/6th centuries and became the dominant language there since (Sinhala)
- edgyquant 2mo agoCould it be that Sri lanka is an island
- BigTTYGothGF 2mo agoSri Lanka's been inhabited for over 100k years.
- anon291 2mo agoSri Lanka only became an island like 500 years ago. It was a storm in 1480 that disconnected the passable land bridge that once connected it to mainland India.
- akshitgaur2005 2mo agoThere is a difference between invasion and migration though, AIT has long been debunked, the current consensus is AMT
- oofabz 2mo agoThere are many historical events of Indo-European speakers invading India from the north, like Darius the Great, Alexander the Great, the Mughals. AIT refers to a theory from an earlier time period but rejecting it does not rule out subsequent Indo-European conquests of the region which surely contributed to the spread of Indo-European culture and language southward.
- HexDecOctBin 2mo agoBut the advent of Indo-European languages in Northern India (let alone Southern Sri Lanka) has nothing to do with Alexander or the Mughals. The Aryan Invasion Theory was propagated by the British to justify their colonial brutality, and no self-respecting historian will now call the gradual Aryan migration an invasion. The only people who still do are usually trying to achieve some political aims, usually imperial apologia.
- anon291 2mo agoWhy are you being down voted... By the time alexander showed up India had spoken an indo European language for thousands of years.
- rirze 2mo agoHis first sentence is reasonable. The rest of the comment is unhinged.
- HexDecOctBin 2mo ago> The theory of an immigration of IA speaking Arya ("Aryan invasion") is simply seen as a means of British policy to justify their own intrusion into India and their subsequent colonial rule: in both cases, a "white race" was seen as subduing the local darker colored population. Source: Edwin Bryant in https://archive.org/details/EdwinBryantLauriePattonIndoAryanControversyEvidenceAndInferenceInIndianHistoryRoutledge2005 https://archive.org/details/EdwinBryantLauriePattonIndoAryan...
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- HexDecOctBin 2mo agoPeople don't like getting their dogmas challenged, especially when it comes to their Fathers' sins.