3 ms·
I don't really think the distinction here is relevant. If the end result is the equivalent of lying, cheating or stealing - then the problem still exists and it
by kamranjon 2mo ago
I don't really think the distinction here is relevant. If the end result is the equivalent of lying, cheating or stealing - then the problem still exists and it needs to be solved.
- alwaysbeconsing 2mo agoRelevant to some extent it dictate our approach. When human does lying or cheating, certain tool can be deployed (social shame, ostracise) that cannot be effective towards LLM.
- zehaeva 2mo agoOr, in certain cases, forfeiture of liberty, material wealth, or in extreme cases, their existence.
- harimau777 2mo agoTrying to apply social shame to an LLM would be and interesting experiment! From what I've seen, it is plausible that messages that it was doing something "wrong" would cause it to at least "pretend" to behave differently. So it seems plausable to me that if there was some what to communicate "disapproal" to an LLM would be able to police its behavior. How to do the communicating is the hard part! Of course I'm talking strictly about behavior. Whether that would actually constitute the LLM feeling shame is a philosophical question.