4 ms·
aren't 3 and 4 a tradeoff though? Yes you have 3 but "decent performance" cannot be an extaled value as compared to "runs everywhere". If its used as a counter
by altmanaltman 2mo ago
aren't 3 and 4 a tradeoff though? Yes you have 3 but "decent performance" cannot be an extaled value as compared to "runs everywhere". If its used as a counter balance to 3 then it shouldn't be its own unique point basically saying 4 is true despite 3 in this case.
- m_ke 2mo agowhen you're waiting for network or LLM inference the raw performance doesn't matter at all
- eglintondust 2mo agoThis line of thinking I feel like assumes it's the only program running on your computer. Using less of my CPU and memory means my computer can do more things in parallel, or even run more instances of the harness. My laptop is sweating when I got 5+ claude code sessions running.
- jaapz 2mo agoIs it actually claude using those CPU cycles though, or the agent running test suites and what not? Honestly I would not be surprised when it actually IS claude using those resources... It is very clearly vibed
- eglintondust 2mo agoI haven't monitored CPU usage so closely, but seems to get heavy with basic tool calls and editing. Memory usage definitely is out of hand, have an idle session right now eating 500MB
- altmanaltman 2mo agoyeah fair enough, my entire point is not about the application itself but the contradiction on using superlative terms for all points but a compromising/normal term for one. Like if performance is not revelant why include it in the list of benefits.
- kingstnap 2mo agoYou would think raw performance wouldn't be a problem given most of whats happening is waiting for network calls and streaming tokens. But modern bloat manages perfectly well to make apps that wait for network calls run poorly enough to give you a bad experience.
- Jtarii 2mo agoThis is so very, very incorrect.