4 ms·
The issue may have to do with NoScript or some other JavaScript blocker as the method appears to rely upon JS. (Tested in Lynx and Firefox with JS disabled.) J
by aseidl 14y ago
The issue may have to do with NoScript or some other JavaScript blocker as the method appears to rely upon JS. (Tested in Lynx and Firefox with JS disabled.)
Jhsto: you might want to include a noscript tag warning visitors about this. Of course it might be better to have this done server side as anything client side will eventually get worked around.
- Jhsto 14y agoThanks, I'll fix this soon enough.